SILICA SPARKS’ TEACHER LEARNING LAB

Learn the science.
Lead the next discovery.

Build your own semiconductor understanding, then help another educator teach it with confidence. Start with system-on-chip thinking and connect your learning to Micro’s mission.

Teacher education Train the trainer Grades 9–16 pathways

Silica Sparks, the Academy’s teacher resource specialist, welcomes educators with a tablet
“Investigate it. Explain it. Help someone else teach it.” — Silica Sparks

Choose your teaching pathway

Teacher education

Use a selected course topic to strengthen your own explanation of chip architecture. Keep a vocabulary list and record one question you still need to investigate.

Grades 9–12 bridge

Adapt one idea into a simple block diagram for Micro: sensing, processing, memory and communication. Keep the university material as teacher background and choose student excerpts only after review.

College / Grades 13–16 extension

Explore architecture trade-offs and verification questions in more depth. Check learners’ preparation against the actual course before assigning technical work.

These are Academy-suggested pathways, not nanoHUB-stated grade bands. The course overview does not establish suitability for every high-school or undergraduate learner.

ACADEMY TRAIN-THE-TRAINER COMPANION

Learn → Model → Teach → Reflect

Use this flexible cycle with a colleague or professional learning group. Choose a manageable topic from the source course; the timings below are suggested workshop timings, not the course duration.

1. Learn: investigate one idea

Read or watch a selected source item. Note its creator and title, then explain the idea in your own words. Identify assumptions, unfamiliar terms and what the source does not answer.

2. Model: connect it to Micro

In a suggested 15-minute discussion, ask: “What must Micro’s chip help the rover do?” Draw blocks for inputs, processing, memory and outputs. Explain that a system-on-chip can integrate multiple functions; a block diagram is a conceptual model, not a fabricated layout.

3. Teach: lead a peer mini-lesson

In a suggested 10-minute teach-back, have a colleague choose one function for hardware or software and explain the trade-off. Ask how they would check that the design meets a requirement. Provide the question in writing and accept a spoken, typed or drawn explanation.

4. Reflect: collect evidence and improve

Ask your colleague to explain one choice without your help. Compare that explanation with the requirement. Record a misconception, an accessibility improvement and one next step before using the activity with learners.

Planning prompts only. No trainer credential, professional-development hours or ADE endorsement is awarded by this page.

Bring it back to the Academy mission

Start with a requirement, explain a design decision and ask what evidence would verify it. Our existing Design Flow mission provides an introductory bridge into these questions.

Arizona alignment is reviewed at the activity level. A course link alone does not demonstrate coverage of Arizona Semiconductor Manufacturing 15.0616.00 or practical manufacturing competency. Electronic Design Automation is distinct from manufacturing automation.

Sources and responsible reuse

Featured source: Anand Raghunathan, ECE 695R: System-on-Chip Design , Purdue University, nanoHUB, Fall 2014. Course overview and licensing policy reviewed November 4, 2026. Academy summaries and teaching prompts on this page are original; no course media, slides or downloads are hosted here.

nanoHUB encourages Creative Commons licensing, but permissions must be checked for each resource. Before adapting or redistributing an item, record its license, attribution requirements and any noncommercial or share-alike restrictions. An embed or download option alone does not establish reuse rights.

Read nanoHUB’s licensing policy →